Topic summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cbs results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 2,024 hits. Analysis detected 13,980 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,244 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (8,148 of 15,766 topics). This Cbs is better (less manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Cbs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,244
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.3% percentile
2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.8%19.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.8%14.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate