Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video673 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cattle Inventory results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 42.9% saturation with 862 hits. Analysis detected 5,140 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,011 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,027 of 16,562 topics). This Cattle Inventory is worse (more manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group.
Cattle Inventory
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,011
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

94% percentile
025507510093.8% percentile
11.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 42.9%42.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 35.0%35.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 18.9%18.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 15.6%15.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 14.5%14.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 33.5%33.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.8%8.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 42.9%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 35.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 33.5%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 14.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos