Why cheaper beef prices are still a long way off99%

By Daniella Genovese0%

12/24/2025, 4:15:43 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 57.9% saturation with 390 hits. Analysis detected 1,536 faulty-reasoning hits from 673 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 99.2% and a BS Rank of 99% (317 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 98.60% of the article peer group.

It's going to be a while before consumers see any relief when it comes to beef prices. 
Prices have hit their peak and are expected to soften, but there isn't much pressure pushing them down right now, Wells Fargo Agri-Food Institute chief agricultural economist Michael Swanson told FOX Business. 
The U.S. should have a little more cattle available in 2026, but buyers are still turning to international suppliers to meet their needs, Swanson said. 
If buyers are still importing, it means domestic supply is still tight and prices will likely remain elevated. 
"It's going to be a slow and painful process for the consumer," Swanson told FOX Business, explaining the complex market forces that need to change in order for prices to decline. 
The cost of beef has been a particular pain point for consumers for years, with retail beef prices hitting record highs in 2024 thanks to a combination of deteriorating pasture conditions, inflation and contracting cattle inventory, according to the Farm Bureau. 
BEEF PRICES ARE CLOSE TO RECORD HIGHS  BUT AMERICANS AREN'T CUTTING BACK 
Beef prices rose sharply in September, outpacing the entire food category on the Department of Labor's consumer price index. 
The price of food rose by 3.1% year over year, while prices for beef and veal shot up 14.7%. 
Problems persist in the industry, according to Farm Bureau economist Bernt Nelson, who wrote in a blog post last week that the Department of Agriculture’s "Cattle on Feed" report highlights ongoing tightness in feeder cattle supplies. 
There were 11.7 million cattle on feed in the U.S. on Nov. 1, down about 2% from 2024 and the lowest number of cattle on feed for the month of November since 2018. 
The report also estimates that 2.04 million head of cattle were placed into feedlots, down about 10% from last year and marking the lowest number of cattle placed on feed for the month of October in report history. 
The smaller number of cattle placed on feed, which is the beef sold in store, is a reflection of tighter supplies of feeder cattle. 
TRUMP ORDERS DOJ TO INVESTIGATE MEATPACKING COMPANIES FOR 'ILLICIT COLLUSION' AMID RISING BEEF PRICES 
There are also several players in the beef supply chain  cattle producers, the meat packers and wholesalers and the retailers  who want to protect their margins. 
Since no one in that supply chain wants to accept lower profits, it becomes harder to lower costs for consumers, Swanson told FOX Business. 
That competition will eventually push beef prices lower. 
The "players in this operation don't want to give up what they have currently. 
And so it's going to be a competition that forces the prices down," he said, adding that "It's never a straight line." 
Signs of that shift are already emerging. 
Swanson said the industry is likely at a turning point following Tyson's announcement last month that it would permanently close a large beef processing plant in Lexington, Nebraska, by January 2026 and that it was reducing operations at its beef facility in Texas to a single shift. 
Immediately after its announcement, live cattle prices fell sharply. 
Though prices bounced back a bit, they're still below the recent highs, according to Swanson. 
That move "immediately sent a big signal to the market that they're going to bid a little less aggressively on live cattle," according to Swanson. 
BESSENT WARNS 'PERFECT STORM' BREWING FOR BEEF PRICES 
He said meat processors couldn't continue to lose money and "Tyson just proved that they're willing to do something difficult about it." 
He believes cattle prices will start to come down, and that seeing a 10% decline, like there was in 2014, isn't "out of the realm" for what could happen over the next year and a half. 
"If the price of cattle goes down and the wholesale price of beef goes down, yes, the retail price of beef will go down," he said. 
But when is it going to happen? 
Not immediately. 
So the consumer's going to be frustrated and they're not seeing immediate relief. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 20.8%Daniella Genovese: 19.6%FoxBusiness: 3.4%Anchoring Bias20.8%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 11.5%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Daniella Genovese: 6.5%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 15.2%Daniella Genovese: 35.2%FoxBusiness: 12.9%Framing Effect15.2%This article: 3.3%Daniella Genovese: 1.9%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error3.3%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 3.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Daniella Genovese: 5.5%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion2.1%This article: 41.6%Daniella Genovese: 23.1%FoxBusiness: 7.9%Negativity Bias41.6%This article: 14.7%Daniella Genovese: 15.6%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias14.7%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 3.8%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 22.3%Daniella Genovese: 9.1%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias22.3%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 4.2%Daniella Genovese: 5.4%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 3.4%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 13.1%Daniella Genovese: 3.8%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias13.1%This article: 2.1%Daniella Genovese: 5.1%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 5.3%Daniella Genovese: 2.9%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal5.3%This article: 57.9%Daniella Genovese: 34.7%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority57.9%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 14.5%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 2.5%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 2.2%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 10.5%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 1.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 16.8%Daniella Genovese: 7.1%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.8%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.9%Daniella Genovese: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope3.9%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniella Genovese: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%

673 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.