Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos673 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wells Fargo results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 1,097 hits. Analysis detected 7,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,267 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,943 of 37,536 keywords). This Wells Fargo is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Wells Fargo
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
82%Wells Fargo (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,267
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 23.1%23.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 7.4%7.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 22.4%22.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 25.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 23.1%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos