Summer sticker shock: The 14% ‘burger tax’ hitting your backyard BBQ this weekend 58%

By Kristen Altus95%

6/13/2026, 11:00:04 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Loss Aversion, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 134 hits. Analysis detected 1,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 564 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.5% and a BS Rank of 58% (9,057 of 21,172 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the article peer group.

Hard-working Americans looking to fire up the grill this weekend are facing major sticker shock before they even light the charcoal. 
As inflation continues to squeeze household budgets, the newly released Wells Fargo summer BBQ food report reveals that hosting a standard summer barbecue for 10 people has climbed to an average of $161  or about $16 per person. 
While total cookout costs are up 2.4% year over year, the real pricing pain is hiding right on the meat tray: the quintessential American hamburger beef has skyrocketed by 14%. 
"Regarding food inflation, price increases this season will really depend on the category. 
For fresh fruits and vegetables, we anticipate some relief as summer unfolds. 
Growers are motivated by higher prices to plant more acreage, so increased supply should help moderate price hikes and may actually offer consumers a bit of a break," Wells Fargo Agri-Food Institute head Robin Wenzel told Fox News Digital. 
"However, for those who value convenience and opt for prepared foods, expect prices to edge up," she warned. 
"These items are driven more by labor, packaging and energy costs than the underlying commodities themselves. 
As consumers continue to pay for convenience, retailers are able to maintain their margins with higher pricing." 
Though burgers are taking the biggest hit from inflation, so are other grilling favorites. 
Chicken and pork products rose 3% from the previous year and are seen as the "cost-friendly" option, while hot dogs and frankfurters are up 5%. 
Ready-made sides like potato salad are up 3% because of higher manufacturing wages being passed on to consumers, the report notes. 
Other favorites like cornbread are up 4%, raw vegetables are up 6%, and if you’re saving room for dessert, sweet-treat prices have increased anywhere from 1% to 4%. 
The higher price tags fall in line with the May consumer price index (CPI)  a broad measure of how much everyday goods like gasoline, groceries and rent cost  which rose 0.5% in May and 4.2% from a year earlier. 
The annual figure is the highest since April 2023. 
Pre-made grocery store shortcuts can be a budget-buster during the summer, as buying a pre-cut vegetable tray adds a $7 premium to your bill, while buying fully cooked, pre-packaged ribs costs $4 more per pound than buying them raw. 
"Hosts can save by preparing ribs from scratch, allowing a bit more room to indulge in prepared veggie trays if desired," Wenzel said. 
"Budget-conscious hosts should thoughtfully weigh where to splurge. 
While pre-cooked ribs are more expensive, pork still offers a better value than beef, which remains a costly grill option." 
Asked to craft the best "inflation-busting" menu, Wenzel recommended serving up chicken, pork, made-from-scratch sides like deviled eggs (eggs are down 14%), watermelon, strawberries (both fruits are down 3%) and cookies or ice cream for dessert. 
"When hosting a BBQ for 10 on a strict budget, plan wisely with proteins and look for value where it counts… the decision between homemade and prepared foods is key. 
Making from scratch, such as potato salad can save money, but convenience has its place," Wenzel said. 
"Beer and wine prices haven’t climbed much, but they’ll still add to the total, so asking guests to BYOB is a smart way to keep costs down." 
FOX Business’ Eric Revell contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.8%Kristen Altus: 7.7%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias4.8%This article: 7.8%Kristen Altus: 3.9%FoxBusiness: 3.5%Anchoring Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 6.1%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 7.3%Kristen Altus: 1.5%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic7.3%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 5.1%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 19.0%Kristen Altus: 17.1%FoxBusiness: 13.0%Framing Effect19.0%This article: 17.0%Kristen Altus: 2.2%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion17.0%This article: 6.6%Kristen Altus: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.6%Kristen Altus: 12.6%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias12.6%This article: 3.2%Kristen Altus: 2.9%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias3.2%This article: 16.3%Kristen Altus: 9.3%FoxBusiness: 7.8%Negativity Bias16.3%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 6.4%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Kristen Altus: 1.1%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error3.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Kristen Altus: 2.9%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 1.1%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 4.2%FoxBusiness: 3.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.5%Kristen Altus: 2.4%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 1.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.7%Kristen Altus: 8.1%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority14.7%This article: 5.3%Kristen Altus: 2.9%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma5.3%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 2.2%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.5%Kristen Altus: 12.3%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization2.5%This article: 5.3%Kristen Altus: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring5.3%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 2.3%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.5%Kristen Altus: 8.3%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion8.5%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 2.0%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 23.8%Kristen Altus: 5.5%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)23.8%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 2.8%Kristen Altus: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature2.8%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 5.9%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.4%Kristen Altus: 2.4%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.4%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.4%Kristen Altus: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground4.4%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.2%Kristen Altus: 1.9%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote9.2%This article: 2.3%Kristen Altus: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection2.3%This article: 9.0%Kristen Altus: 6.0%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice9.0%This article: 11.5%Kristen Altus: 1.5%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination11.5%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 4.4%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Kristen Altus: 4.1%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.9%

564 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers47%attributed speech297writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageRobin Wenzel • 13 words • 100.0% coverageRobin Wenzel • 12 words • 0.0% coverageRobin Wenzel • 39 words • 100.0% coverageRobin Wenzel • 18 words • 0.0% coverageRobin Wenzel • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageRobin Wenzel • 23 words • 0.0% coverageRobin Wenzel • 8 words • 100.0% coverageRobin Wenzel • 20 words • 0.0% coverageRobin Wenzel • 36 words • 0.0% coverageRobin Wenzel • 30 words • 100.0% coverageRobin Wenzel • 17 words • 0.0% coverageRobin Wenzel • 27 words • 100.0% coverageFOX Business • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Robin Wenzel

100%flagged-word coverage
259 attributed words97% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Indoctrination+25.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Robin Wenzel: 25.1%25.1%Biased Writer Voice-17.2 ptsWriter: 17.2%Robin Wenzel: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +15.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Robin Wenzel: 15.1%15.1%Unattributed Quote-8.1 ptsWriter: 13.1%Robin Wenzel: 5.0%5.0%Quote-first Misdirection+5.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Robin Wenzel: 5.0%5.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.