Keyword summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos1,820 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grocery Prices results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 1,639 hits. Analysis detected 11,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,682 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,940 of 37,533 keywords). This Grocery Prices is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Grocery Prices
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
50%Grocery Prices (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510049.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 18.9%18.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate