Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,578 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philip Bump results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Horn Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 3,717 hits . Analysis detected 26,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,971 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,411 of 6,585 authors). This Philip Bump is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group. Philip Bump
Author details
Total words: 13,971
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.6% percentile 4.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles14K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 11.5% 11.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 17.2% 17.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 25.9% 25.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 7.7% 7.7% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 26.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.9%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 17.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Horn Effect: Author 11.5%, sitewide 1.0% Ad Hominem: Author 11.2%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.2%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Genetic Fallacy: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst