Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniella Genovese results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.2% saturation with 2,069 hits . Analysis detected 13,582 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,878 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 92% (591 of 6,628 authors). This Daniella Genovese is worse (more manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group. Daniella Genovese
Author details
Total words: 5,878
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.1% percentile 7.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 34.7% 34.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 19.6% 19.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 15.6% 15.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 35.2% 35.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.1% 23.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.1% 7.1% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 35.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 34.7%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 19.6%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.5%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 15.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst