Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,550 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tyson Foods results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43% saturation with 1,996 hits. Analysis detected 11,624 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,642 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,400 of 36,940 keywords). This Tyson Foods is worse (more manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Tyson Foods
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
94%Tyson Foods (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,642
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

94% percentile
025507510093.5% percentile
8.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 43.0%43.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 24.5%24.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 38.1%38.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 26.0%26.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 10.0%10.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 43.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 38.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 26.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 24.5%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos