Topic summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video183 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catastrophe Insurance results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Bandwagon, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 681 faulty-reasoning hits from 549 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,002 of 16,562 topics). This Catastrophe Insurance is worse (more manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group.
Catastrophe Insurance
Topic details
Total words: 549
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510087.9% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles549 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 15.5%15.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 16.8%16.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 24.0%24.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.6%18.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 15.5%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos