Topic summary
⁠14%2 analyzed articles/videos814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Career results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,157 hits. Analysis detected 3,482 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,313 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (16,460 of 16,562 topics). This Career is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
Career
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,313
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

1% percentile
02550751000.6% percentile
0.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos