Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carbon Capture And Storage results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 481 hits. Analysis detected 4,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (13,488 of 15,769 topics). This Carbon Capture And Storage is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Carbon Capture And Storage

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510014.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos