Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,957 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caracas results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,014 hits. Analysis detected 5,242 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,828 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,174 of 16,452 topics). This Caracas is better (less manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos