Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These PEDRO MATTEY results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Anchoring Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 115 faulty-reasoning hits from 264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (589 of 6,270 authors). This PEDRO MATTEY is worse (more manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
PEDRO MATTEY
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠91%PEDRO MATTEY (selected)8%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 264
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

91% percentile
025507510090.6% percentile
7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles264 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.8%9.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 8.7%8.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 8.7%8.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.7%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos