Topic summary
⁠43%2 analyzed articles/videos2,666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Car Reviews results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 960 hits. Analysis detected 7,413 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,649 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,184 of 16,562 topics). This Car Reviews is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Car Reviews
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,649
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510020.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos