Topic summary
71% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,007 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Candidate Vetting results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Hindsight Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 2,642 hits . Analysis detected 17,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,321 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,459 of 16,431 topics). This Candidate Vetting is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group. Candidate Vetting
Topic details
Total words: 15,321
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Straw Man: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst