Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cancer Risk results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 567 hits. Analysis detected 4,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,258 of 16,562 topics). This Cancer Risk is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Cancer Risk
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.7%7.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos