Topic summary
22% 1 analyzed article/video 755 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campus Voting results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Confirmation Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 226 hits . Analysis detected 1,776 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (9,284 of 21,327 topics). This Campus Voting is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Campus Voting
Topic details
Total words: 3,020
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.1% 2.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst