Author summary
70% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,249 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DemocracyDocket results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 1,357 hits . Analysis detected 12,428 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,996 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,796 of 8,366 authors). This DemocracyDocket is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group. DemocracyDocket
Author details
Total words: 12,996
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.1% 6.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.4% 10.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst