Publication summary
64%6 analyzed articles/videos5,718 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democracy Docket results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 2,165 hits. Analysis detected 20,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,560 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (263 of 546 publications). This Democracy Docket is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Democracy Docket
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%BridgeDetroit1%
1%Mondoweiss1%
52%Democracy Docket (selected)2%
100%The White House9%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 28,560
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

52% percentile
025507510051.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles28.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Publication 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate