Publication summary
64% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,718 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democracy Docket results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 2,165 hits . Analysis detected 20,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,560 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (263 of 546 publications). This Democracy Docket is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 28,560
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles28.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst