Topic summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campaign Ethics results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 1,250 hits. Analysis detected 5,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,190 of 15,765 topics). This Campaign Ethics is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Campaign Ethics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,340
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 37.4%37.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.0%7.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 37.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos