Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,693 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Business & Economy results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 570 hits . Analysis detected 5,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,772 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (10,923 of 15,792 topics). This Business & Economy is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group. Business & Economy
Topic details
Total words: 6,772
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst