Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video715 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bundibugyo Virus results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 1,939 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,500 of 16,562 topics). This Bundibugyo Virus is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Bundibugyo Virus
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,860
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.8% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos