Topic summary
⁠78%5 analyzed articles/videos3,734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Budget Cuts results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 2,483 hits. Analysis detected 15,528 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,479 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,034 of 16,562 topics). This Budget Cuts is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Budget Cuts
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.6%21.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Horn Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos