Topic summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video889 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Budget Analysis results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 245 hits. Analysis detected 2,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,709 of 16,562 topics). This Budget Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Budget Analysis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.9%6.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Middle Ground: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos