Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brooklyn Crime results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 315 hits. Analysis detected 2,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,310 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (14,694 of 15,414 topics). This Brooklyn Crime is better (less manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group.
Brooklyn Crime

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

5% percentile
02550751004.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos