Topic summary
⁠23%2 analyzed articles/videos3,490 analyzed words
BS Summary: These British Grand Prix results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 964 hits. Analysis detected 8,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,960 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (15,418 of 16,562 topics). This British Grand Prix is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
British Grand Prix
Topic details
Total words: 13,960
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751006.9% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles14K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos