Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ASSISTANT SHOWBUSINESS EDITOR results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 807 hits . Analysis detected 4,265 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,860 of 6,628 authors). This ASSISTANT SHOWBUSINESS EDITOR is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. ASSISTANT SHOWBUSINESS EDITOR
Author details
Total words: 5,320
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 10.4% 10.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 15.2% 15.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 15.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.4%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst