Topic summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video1,253 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brazilian Politics results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 355 hits. Analysis detected 2,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,759 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,614 of 16,562 topics). This Brazilian Politics is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Brazilian Politics
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠24%Brazilian Politics (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,759
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.3%8.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos