Topic summary
68% 7 analyzed articles/videos 6,426 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brazil results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 2,740 hits . Analysis detected 22,348 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,399 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,928 of 16,443 topics). This Brazil is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group. Brazil
Topic details
Total words: 23,399
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles23.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst