Topic summary
82% 4 analyzed articles/videos 776 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Box Office Performance results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 735 hits . Analysis detected 7,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,080 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (6,364 of 16,230 topics). This Box Office Performance is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group. Box Office Performance
Topic details
Total words: 6,080
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.8% percentile 3.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst