Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boulder City results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 297 faulty-reasoning hits from 783 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (5,933 of 16,494 topics). This Boulder City is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Boulder City
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 783
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.0% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles783 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.2%4.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 5.9%5.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos