Topic summary
⁠95%2 analyzed articles/videos906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Policy results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 651 hits. Analysis detected 4,857 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,718 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,478 of 16,562 topics). This Border Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Border Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,718
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
5.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.9%23.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 14.5%14.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 4.6%4.6%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Horn Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos