Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Enforcement results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.2% saturation with 2,234 hits. Analysis detected 8,521 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,163 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,076 of 16,562 topics). This Border Enforcement is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Border Enforcement
Topic details
Total words: 6,163
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.3% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 29.0%29.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 36.3%36.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.0%24.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 36.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 29.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos