DOJ sues 4 Dem.-run states over denying ICE undercover license plates 59%

By Jenna Lee0%

5/28/2026, 5:56:55 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.1% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 1,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 493 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.1% and a BS Rank of 59% (8,885 of 21,180 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the article peer group.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is suing four states over their refusal to issue undercover license plates to U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. 
On Thursday, the DOJ revealed that it filed lawsuits against Maine, Massachusetts, Oregon and Washington in an effort to dismantle local policies that the administration says are compromising the safety and effectiveness of federal immigration enforcement officers. 
The states are accused of refusing to rescind policies blocking ICE from obtaining confidential license plates used to carry out arrests as part of President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown. 
“By denying undercover license plates to DHS components, including ICE, while issuing them to their own state agencies, these governors are pursuing discriminatory and obstructionist policies against federal law enforcement,” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stated forcefully, emphasizing the department’s unyielding commitment to agent safety. 
“Law enforcement officers risk their lives every day to keep Americans safe and must be able to carry out their duties effectively.” 
The litigation—which mirrors the administration’s broader efforts to shield field personnel, such as defending the right of federal agents to wear tactical masks on assignment in American cities—follows an intense back-and-forth between the DOJ and defiant state officials. 
Earlier this month, the administration dispatched formal warning letters demanding that state authorities justify or rescind their plate restrictions. 
State officials pushed back after the DOJ accused the states of trying “to obstruct the Federal Government’s immigration enforcement efforts, even though control over immigration and the nation’s borders is an exclusive federal power.” 
“What ICE did in Maine and continues to do was terrorize our friends and neighbors. 
There are no secret police in a democracy and we will always stand up for our Mainers’ safety and freedom,” said Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows. 
Washington Governor Bob Ferguson (D-Wash.) maintained that his state continues to provide assistance for federal criminal law enforcement, but stood by Washington’s denial of plates for civil enforcement. 
“Judges across the country have found that the Department of Homeland Security’s tactics in conducting civil immigration enforcement routinely violate the Constitution. 
That is unacceptable. 
Our state will not facilitate that misconduct,” said Ferguson in an email to AP News. 
A spokesperson for Oregon Governor Tina Kotek (D-Ore.) cited the Oregon Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)’s temporary pause on the issuance of new undercover license plates to federal agencies, noting that the state is currently reviewing its policies and rules. 
“State and local law enforcement are unaffected by this pause and the federal agencies that participate in the program are able to continue to use their existing unexpired plates,” said the spokesperson. 
“Law enforcement officers risk their lives every day to keep Americans safe and must be able to carry out their duties effectively,” added Blanche, emphasizing the department’s intent to protect the operational safety of federal agents. 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.4%Jenna Lee: 2.6%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias14.4%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.6%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.2%Jenna Lee: 3.5%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic16.2%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.9%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 33.1%Jenna Lee: 8.9%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect33.1%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.7%Jenna Lee: 1.4%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.5%Jenna Lee: 1.0%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias6.5%This article: 9.9%Jenna Lee: 1.4%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias9.9%This article: 34.1%Jenna Lee: 11.3%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias34.1%This article: 3.0%Jenna Lee: 1.6%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.9%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Jenna Lee: 2.3%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.3%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 1.1%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.3%Jenna Lee: 1.6%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias7.3%This article: 8.1%Jenna Lee: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect8.1%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 3.5%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.5%Jenna Lee: 3.5%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority4.5%This article: 12.0%Jenna Lee: 2.6%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma12.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 7.3%Jenna Lee: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning7.3%This article: 4.5%Jenna Lee: 4.0%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization4.5%This article: 7.7%Jenna Lee: 0.9%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring7.7%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 23.9%Jenna Lee: 8.5%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion23.9%This article: 12.0%Jenna Lee: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question12.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 1.9%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 1.5%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.9%Jenna Lee: 1.2%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof3.9%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.5%Jenna Lee: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal8.5%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.6%Jenna Lee: 1.9%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.6%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.1%Jenna Lee: 1.9%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote8.1%This article: 12.2%Jenna Lee: 1.9%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection12.2%This article: 15.2%Jenna Lee: 6.4%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice15.2%This article: 0.4%Jenna Lee: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination0.4%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jenna Lee: 3.3%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Jenna Lee: 2.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.0%

493 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers51%attributed speech240writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 45 words • 100.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageShenna Bellows • 15 words • 100.0% coverageShenna Bellows • 27 words • 0.0% coverageBob Ferguson • 28 words • 0.0% coverageBob Ferguson • 22 words • 0.0% coverageBob Ferguson • 3 words • 0.0% coverageBob Ferguson • 15 words • 0.0% coverageOregon Governor Tina Kotek • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Shenna Bellows

100%flagged-word coverage
42 attributed words17% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Quote-first Misdirection+35.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Shenna Bellows: 35.7%35.7%Biased Writer Voice-31.3 ptsWriter: 31.3%Shenna Bellows: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -6.3 ptsWriter: 6.3%Shenna Bellows: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-0.8 ptsWriter: 0.8%Shenna Bellows: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.