Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Boomtowns results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 1,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Boomtowns is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Boomtowns
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,260
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.6%14.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.0%22.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos