Topic summary
⁠62%4 analyzed articles/videos1,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bond Market results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 695 hits. Analysis detected 4,866 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,442 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,715 of 16,562 topics). This Bond Market is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Bond Market
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,442
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.6% percentile
5.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 14.6%14.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 8.5%8.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.6%11.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 14.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos