Topic summary
⁠11%3 analyzed articles/videos1,634 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Black Holes results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 351 hits. Analysis detected 3,073 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,536 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,933 of 16,562 topics). This Black Holes is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Black Holes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,536
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.9%1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos