Topic summary
⁠51%3 analyzed articles/videos364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bipartisan Legislation results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 1,097 hits. Analysis detected 6,144 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,149 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (6,764 of 15,447 topics). This Bipartisan Legislation is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Bipartisan Legislation
Topic details
Total words: 5,149
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.3%21.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.3%6.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos