Topic summary
â 25% 9 analyzed articles/videos 8,878 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biodiversity results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 2,017 hits . Analysis detected 20,061 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,354 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of â 5% (15,303 of 15,988 topics). This Biodiversity is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group. Biodiversity
Topic details
Total words: 35,354
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score9 analyzed articles35.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst