Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mandana Tadayon results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Indoctrination , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 387 hits . Analysis detected 2,506 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,642 of 6,263 authors). This Mandana Tadayon is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Mandana Tadayon
Author details
Total words: 3,576
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.8% 10.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 9.7%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst