Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,024 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Billionaire Tax results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 900 hits. Analysis detected 5,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,096 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (5,755 of 15,329 topics). This Billionaire Tax is worse (more manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group.
Billionaire Tax
Topic details
Total words: 4,096
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510062.5% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 18.1%18.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.1%12.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.0%22.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos