Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Clinton results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 315 hits. Analysis detected 2,405 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,669 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,035 of 16,562 topics). This Bill Clinton is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Bill Clinton
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,669
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.6% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.4%6.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.1%10.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos