Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,035 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Belgium National Football Team results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 865 hits. Analysis detected 2,657 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (9,807 of 15,802 topics). This Belgium National Football Team is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Belgium National Football Team
Topic details
Total words: 4,140
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos