Topic summary
⁠97%2 analyzed articles/videos1,411 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beauty Industry results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 1,120 hits. Analysis detected 10,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,644 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,903 of 16,562 topics). This Beauty Industry is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
Beauty Industry
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,644
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.4% percentile
5.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.4%16.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.7%9.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.9%17.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.5%13.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 19.8%19.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos