Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Paul DeJoria results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Slippery Slope , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 1,086 hits . Analysis detected 6,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 88% (853 of 6,628 authors). This John Paul DeJoria is worse (more manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group. John Paul DeJoria
Author details
Total words: 3,336
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.1% percentile 5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 32.5% 32.5% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 14.5% 14.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.7% 16.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.9% 9.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.7% 13.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 12.3% 12.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.8% 10.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Author 32.5%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 16.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Slippery Slope: Author 14.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.7%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 9.9%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Straw Man: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst