Author summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 577 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neighborhood Development Center results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 501 hits . Analysis detected 3,417 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 91% (620 of 6,362 authors). This Neighborhood Development Center is worse (more manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group. Neighborhood Development Center
Author details
Total words: 2,308
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.3% percentile 7.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 21.7% 21.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.4% 20.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 17.6% 17.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.8% 19.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.8% 14.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.9% 12.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.8%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 21.7%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 17.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 12.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst