Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos7,122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beauty results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Bandwagon, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 52.8% saturation with 17,311 hits. Analysis detected 50,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,794 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (6,609 of 15,312 topics). This Beauty is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Beauty
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 32,794
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles32.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 52.8%52.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.0%0.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 52.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos