Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,006 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sofia Quaglia results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Overconfidence Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 2,015 hits . Analysis detected 14,783 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,452 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (5,525 of 6,135 authors). This Sofia Quaglia is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group. Sofia Quaglia
Author details
Total words: 23,452
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles23.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst