Topic summary
10%2 analyzed articles/videos1,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bastille Day results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 346 hits. Analysis detected 2,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,224 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (9,947 of 16,266 topics). This Bastille Day is better (less manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
Bastille Day
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,224
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos